The nerve! I was listening to Radio 4, and they were lamenting the lack of decent books for up to 12 year olds. As per usual, Twilight was being slandered, and they were blaming the current kids book drought upon it, because it was causing authors to write floods of supernatural romance for teens. This I can deal with, because I myself am tired of the many mary-sue's and their moping boyfriends. But then, something was said that I found most annoying. One author on the program said she was horrified that kids were reading Twilight and The Hunger Games at10 or 11 years because they were blatantly and disgustingly age-inappropriate.
I'm sorry, what?! You think it is bad that children of 11 are reading the Hunger Games. I'm sorry, but at 11 me and all my friends had read things like 1984, which has a very similar dystopian premise and decidedly more inappropriate-ness. yet no-one bats an eyelid at this because it's a classic. It's like how many people do not object to kids reading Lolita, because it is a classic. Lord of the flies is a classic, and that has some very "innapropriate" things also. I think the whole issue is full of double-standards, depending on the books place in history.
Also, to all of you bookish people. When talking about how the standards of teen fiction have fallen, please don't talk about Twilight and The Hunger Games interchangeably. They are barely any similarities beside target audience, and one is considerably more well-written than the other.
/endrant
And now, some music that you should treat your ears to
Eight-leggedly Yours
The Literary Spider
I'm sorry, what?! You think it is bad that children of 11 are reading the Hunger Games. I'm sorry, but at 11 me and all my friends had read things like 1984, which has a very similar dystopian premise and decidedly more inappropriate-ness. yet no-one bats an eyelid at this because it's a classic. It's like how many people do not object to kids reading Lolita, because it is a classic. Lord of the flies is a classic, and that has some very "innapropriate" things also. I think the whole issue is full of double-standards, depending on the books place in history.
Also, to all of you bookish people. When talking about how the standards of teen fiction have fallen, please don't talk about Twilight and The Hunger Games interchangeably. They are barely any similarities beside target audience, and one is considerably more well-written than the other.
/endrant
And now, some music that you should treat your ears to
Eight-leggedly Yours
The Literary Spider